PyOhio is using a two-phase review process for 2019. This is intended to allow attendees and others interested in PyOhio to have input in the talk selection decision while leaving the final program curation up to the Program Committee.
Phase One: Ranking of anonymized proposals
During this phase, the reviewers will score each proposal solely on the title, description, and abstract contents. Other proposal fields will be hidden including any identifying information or notes about the speaker(s) proposing the talk.
Anyone interested in helping provide input is invited to become a reviewer.
Phase Two: Identity-aware curation and selection
The Program Committee will use the scored proposals in conjunction with speaker profiles to rank and organize a program while ensuring diversity of speakers and topics.